The first FDA-approved clinical trial of psilocin has begun 

The trial is also the first authorized by the FDA to test naturally grown mushroom psilocybin.
Sign up for the Freethink Weekly newsletter!
A collection of our favorite stories straight to your inbox

Filament Health has begun dosing subjects in a new phase 1 trial of psilocybin and psilocin — active compounds in magic mushrooms — conducted at UC San Francisco’s Translational Psychedelic Research Program (TrPR).

The company says that these are the first FDA-approved trials to use naturally-derived versions of the compounds, as opposed to synthesized versions created in a lab. It is also the first time any form of psilocin has been used directly in an FDA-approved trial.

“The objective of this trial is to determine if there are any benefits associated with the direct administration of psilocin as this has never been done before,” Filament Health co-founder and CEO Ben Lightburn tells Freethink.

“The objective of this trial is to determine if there are any benefits associated with the direct administration of psilocin as this has never been done before.”

Ben Lightburn

According to the study’s design details, participants will receive oral psilocybin, oral psilocin, and sublingual (absorbed under the tongue) psilocin, in a randomized order. 

Some volunteers will potentially have a fourth administration of sublingual psilocin. All subjects will also receive psychological support, and have physiological effects like blood pressure and heart rate monitored.

“This trial will provide crucial information about the effects and mechanisms of these compounds that could allow for greatly enhanced psychedelic-assisted therapy,” said Joshua Woolley, TrPR director and the study’s principal investigator.

Naturally-derived vs. synthetic: When researchers are studying the effects of psychedelic drugs in a clinical setting, they typically turn to lab-made versions of them to ensure consistency and purity of the compounds.

Pure synthetic psilocybin is chemically no different than pure naturally-derived psilocybin, pioneering pharmacologist David E. Nichols tells Freethink. (He should know — his lab was the first to synthesize the compound since Albert Hofmann did it in the 1950s.)

“The same types of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen atoms are in both natural and synthetic psilocybin,” Nichols says.

But using naturally derived compounds may have potential benefits. 

“Our drug candidates contain a specific quantity of pure natural psilocybin, but they also contain additional sub metabolites extracted from the magic mushroom which we believe may offer a potential ‘entourage effect,’” Lightburn tells Freethink.

“In other words, these additional compounds could enhance the effects of the psilocybin, just as they’ve evolved to do in the magic mushroom.”

A dosing room at UCSF’s Translational Psychedelic Research Program. Filament Health

From the consumer’s perspective, there may be a psychological factor, as well, Lightburn says: people tend to prefer products they consider more natural — like drinking coffee or tea rather than taking a caffeine pill. 

“A natural psychedelic drug could lead to more widespread adoption,” Lightburn suggests. 

This trial will only be testing pure natural extracts of psilocybin and psilocin, however.

Psilocybin vs psilocin: Perhaps most interesting to you Dope Science readers is Filament’s trial of psilocin, rather than psilocybin, to patients. 

Psilocin is what the body naturally converts psilocybin into: it’s what’s actually causing you to trip. 

“Psilocybin is converted into psilocin by enzymes in the gut,” Nichols says. “If you administer psilocybin and analyze the blood, the only thing you see is psilocin, which is actually the biologically active molecule.”

There could be a few potential benefits to administering psilocin directly and skipping the process the body uses to convert it. 

Not all of any drug ever gets exactly where it needs to go. Researchers call the percentage of the drug that reaches its target the drug’s bioavailability.

When taken orally, psilocybin has a bioavailability between 40-75%, Nichols explains, which could account for some of the variability in treatment outcomes in clinical trials.

Administering psilocin directly could make the treatment more consistent. Cutting out the metabolizing step may also help curb the nausea people sometimes experience with psilocybin, and increase how quickly the drug takes effect.

Administering the psilocin directly skips metabolizing psilocybin and may make treatment more consistent.

That’s also why they’re testing the under-the-tongue route for psilocin.

“We decided to explore sublingual psilocin administration because it is the active drug and does not require metabolism before passage through the blood brain barrier,” Lightburn says.

In other words, you don’t need to digest it first to trip, which should make the treatment more consistent. 

“Therefore, a more direct administration into the bloodstream should decrease onset time even further and stabilize the variable bioavailability seen in oral dosing of psilocybin.”

Study completion is estimated to be in December 2024.

We’d love to hear from you! If you have a comment about this article or if you have a tip for a future Freethink story, please email us at [email protected].

Sign up for the Freethink Weekly newsletter!
A collection of our favorite stories straight to your inbox
Related
Has the US reached “peak obesity”?
A CDC survey suggests America’s obesity rate may be falling. Is this a turning point in the obesity epidemic? Or just a temporary plateau?
The exciting research that may cure Parkinson’s 
GeneCode is developing a drug it hopes won’t just alleviate Parkinson’s symptoms but also protect and restore patient’s neural health.
AI chatbots may ease the world’s loneliness (if they don’t make it worse)
AI chatbots may have certain advantages when roleplaying as our friends. They may also come with downsides that make our loneliness worse.
Beyond screen time: Rethinking kids’ tech use with the “Goldilocks hypothesis”
The “Goldilocks hypothesis” asks parents to think beyond screen time and consider the habits that teens build around technology use.
Potato chips or heroin? The debate on social media and mental health
Experts disagree on whether social media causes mental health issues in adolescents despite looking at the same data. Here’s why.
Up Next
Subscribe to Freethink for more great stories