The next generation of living machines: xenobots 2.0

Researchers have improved upon their first version of the minuscule living machines.
Sign up for the Freethink Weekly newsletter!
A collection of our favorite stories straight to your inbox

Last year, something new was grafted to the tree of life. 

Somewhere between a living organism and a robot, these tiny, living machines were created from clumps of stem cells from the African clawed frog. Stem cells from the heart gave them muscle, while skin stem cells provided structure.

Dubbed “Xenobots” (after the frog’s scientific name — not, alas, xenomorphs), their creators found that the living machines that could complete simple tasks in Petri dishes, as Freethink’s Amanda Winkler explained last year.

Those same researchers, from Tufts and the University of Vermont, have now developed a second iteration, Xenobots 2.0, if you will, which can “self-assemble a body from single cells, do not require muscle cells to move, and even demonstrate the capability of recordable memory,” as Tufts Now explains.

These Xenobots are also faster, can make their way through more complex environments, live longer than their predecessors, work in concert, and heal themselves.

Yeah, that sounds a lot like the T-1000 to me, too.

Xenobots, Roll Out!

First generation Xenobots were constructed with a “top-down” approach, as Tufts put it. The researchers manually placed and surgically sculpted the heart and skin cells to form tiny biological robots in a variety of shapes.

Their shapes — chosen with the help of a digital Xenobots simulator — then impacted their various movements.

The original Xenobots were capable of “crawling, traveling in circles, moving small objects — or even joining with other organic bots to collectively perform tasks,” Winkler reported.

But to create Xenobots 2.0, the researchers utilized a “bottom up” approach, published in the journal Science Robotics

Rather than crafting the frog heart and stem cells, the researchers simply scraped off some skin stem cells from frog embryos. Left to their own devices, the cells glommed together into spheroids on their own. 

They could survive for 10 days without food and even grow if some sugar’s in the mix. 

“We’ve grown them for over four months in the lab,” Tufts’ Doug Blackiston, study coauthor, told Science News. “They do really interesting things if you grow them,” including forming new, balloon-like shapes.

Some of the cells adapted to grow cilia a few days in. Usually used by cells to push away pathogens and ensure a nice coating of protective mucus, the Xenobots used their cilia to move around, eliminating the need for heart stem cells.

It’s an example of life’s remarkable plasticity, the researchers say.

“In a frog embryo, cells cooperate to create a tadpole. Here, removed from that context, we see that cells can re-purpose their genetically encoded hardware, like cilia, for new functions such as locomotion,” Michael Levin, professor of biology and director of Tufts’ Allen Discovery Center — and study corresponding author — told Tufts Now. 

“It is amazing that cells can spontaneously take on new roles and create new body plans and behaviors without long periods of evolutionary selection for those features.”

Along with those new body plans came new abilities. Xenobots 2.0 can move around just like the first iteration did, but they are faster than what the researchers constructed. They’re also better at sweeping up junk — a swarm of them can round up iron oxide particles in a Petri dish — and they can coat flat surfaces and shimmy through narrow capillaries.

Because they are biological, the Xenobots could also heal themselves, forming back together after injury — even recovering from full-length lacerations halfway through their “bodies” — in just 5 minutes.

Just like before, the Tufts team turned to computer simulations to tease out the best Xenobot layouts. Researchers at the University of Vermont did the data crunching, using the Vermont Advanced Computing Core’s supercomputer cluster, called Deep Green.

Deep Green comes in because “it’s not at all obvious — for people — what a successful design should look like,” UVM computer scientist and robotics expert Josh Bongard told Tufts Now. “That’s where the supercomputer comes in and searches over the space of all possible Xenobot swarms to find the swarm that does the job best.”

The hope is that eventually Xenobots will be able to perform tasks like clearing microplastics from the ocean, or decontaminating soil.

Time to Remember

Performing those jobs would be a hell of a lot easier with the ability to retain and access memory for guiding their actions — something the original Xenobots lacked. This time around, the researchers gave them the ability to hold on to one piece of information.

The researchers injected the frog stem cells with mRNA carrying the instructions for a protein called EosFP. This protein normally glows green, but when exposed to a specific wavelength of light, it turns red instead. 

Armed with their little running light, the Xenobots could now keep a record of being exposed to certain wavelengths of blue light in their environment. Further work could potentially allow them to keep track of multiple variables, or even alter their behaviors accordingly.

“When we bring in more capabilities to the bots, we can use the computer simulations to design them with more complex behaviors and the ability to carry out more elaborate tasks,” Bongard said. “We could potentially design them not only to report conditions in their environment but also to modify and repair conditions in their environment.”

A New Form of Life?

The researchers’ original work already opened questions of what, exactly, Xenobots are. Are they lifeforms? Robots, but made of biological material, in lieu of nuts and bolts? 

As you can imagine, these improved iterations — which organize on their own — are provoking more of the same.

Tel Aviv University evolutionary biologist Eva Jablonka, who is unaffiliated with the work, told Quanta Magazine that she considers them a new form of life “defined by what it does rather than to what it belongs developmentally and evolutionarily.”

University of Melbourne digital ethics researcher Kobi Leins believes new ethical issues arise with the creation of new forms of life. “Scientists like to make things, and don’t necessarily think about what the repercussions are,” she told Science News.

(For what it’s worth, Levin agrees, telling Science News the questions raised by the Xenobots are like “finding a whole galaxy of weird new things.”)

Levin hopes that within that galaxy, the Xenobots will do more than perform tasks: they may help us understand how biological life itself develops.

We’d love to hear from you! If you have a comment about this article or if you have a tip for a future Freethink story, please email us at [email protected].

Sign up for the Freethink Weekly newsletter!
A collection of our favorite stories straight to your inbox
Related
How cryopreservation could end death as we know it
The technology could one day allow people with terminal illnesses to go into “hibernation” until a cure is found.
Revolutionary weight-loss drugs like Wegovy come with a catch
People taking GLP-1 agonists are losing too much muscle, but these drugs designed to prevent muscle loss could solve the problem.
What hybrid mouse/rat brains are showing us about the mind
Modified mice with hybrid brains that include rat neurons could one day lead to new breakthroughs in neuroscience.
Meet the humanoids: 8 robots ready to revolutionize work
Everything you need to know about the humanoids that will soon enter the workforce — or are in it already.
AI can help predict whether a patient will respond to specific tuberculosis treatments
Instead of a one-size-fits-all treatment approach, AI could help personalize treatments for each patient to provide the best outcomes.
Up Next
spherical robot Daedalus
Subscribe to Freethink for more great stories