New nuclear fuel could replace uranium in reactors

ANEEL could be the safer, cheaper alternative to enriched uranium.

Nuclear power could play a pivotal role in the fight against climate change — it’s cleaner than fossil fuels and more reliable than renewables such as wind or solar.

But one thing holding the industry back is the need for a better nuclear fuel — and a team of researchers may have figured out how to make it.

Need for a Better Nuclear Fuel

To generate electricity, nuclear reactors split atoms to release energy, usually using the heavy metal uranium.

Uranium isn’t terribly rare — there’s about as much of it on Earth as there is tin — but uranium straight out of the ground isn’t ideal for nuclear fuel, so the next step is a process called “enrichment,” which concentrates a rare isotope, called uranium-235, that makes the atoms easier to split. This process is both complicated and expensive.

When enriched uranium is used as a nuclear fuel, the byproduct is nuclear waste, which includes radioactive elements like plutonium.

Disposing of this waste is one of the challenges of nuclear energy. Another is the fact that both plutonium and highly enriched uranium can be used to make weapons, making proliferation a concern.

All that to say enriched uranium isn’t necessarily the ideal nuclear fuel, but switching to something else often requires developing a brand new type of reactor — like a molten salt reactor — and that would be neither cheap nor easy.

Now, researchers in the U.S. have developed a new nuclear fuel they say would work with two existing types of nuclear reactors, including 49 already in operation in nine different countries — while also overcoming many of enriched uranium’s shortcomings.

Introducing ANEEL

The new nuclear fuel is called Advanced Nuclear Energy for Enriched Life (ANEEL), and it’s the result of a collaboration between the U.S. Department of Energy’s Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Texas A&M University, and the Chicago-based company Clean Core Thorium Energy.

ANEEL combines the metal thorium with low-grade enriched uranium.

Thorium is about four times more abundant than uranium and easier to extract — it can even be pulled from seawater — which could bring nuclear energy to places where access to uranium is currently a barrier.

Dozens of reactors are already compatible with the new nuclear fuel.

ANEEL reportedly generates more energy than enriched uranium, pound for pound. It produces 80% less waste, and the waste it does produce contains less plutonium.

ANEEL is also less likely than uranium to cause a meltdown, thanks to a lower operating temperature and a higher melting point.

Texas A&M is now producing ANEEL pellets to send to the INL for extensive testing.

If the nuclear fuel meets safety standards, it could potentially replace uranium in the dozens of compatible nuclear reactors across the globe — and maybe even spur investment in more ANEEL-ready reactors.

We’d love to hear from you! If you have a comment about this article or if you have a tip for a future Freethink story, please email us at tips@freethink.com.

Related
Charting the evolution of nuclear energy
Nuclear fission’s stalled growth might give way to fusion’s clean energy potential
The master plan to end EV “range anxiety” forever
A look at the history of EV charging and the tech trends that could encourage more people to make the switch to an electric car.
America’s plan to resurrect nuclear power
To increase its supply of clean nuclear power, the US government is cutting licensing fees, rewarding reactor innovation, and more.
The future of data centers — on land, at sea, and in space
As our digital world grows, demand for data centers is also increasing. To meet that demand sustainably, developers are getting creative.
US hits 180 GW of solar power. Here’s how we get to 1,000 by 2035.
A quick look at the history of solar power in the US and the trends that could lead us into our sun-powered future.
Up Next
Sustainable Shoes
Exit mobile version