Cyborg computer combining AI and human brain cells really works

It could perform a speech recognition task with 78% accuracy.
Subscribe to Freethink on Substack for free
Get our favorite new stories right to your inbox every week

A new biohybrid computer combining a “brain organoid” and a traditional AI was able to perform a speech recognition task with 78% accuracy — demonstrating the potential for human biology to one day boost our computing capabilities.

The background: The human brain is the most energy efficient “computer” on Earth — while a supercomputer needs 20 megawatts of power to process more than a quintillion calculations per second, your brain can do the equivalent with just 20 watts (a megawatt is 1 million watts).

This has given researchers the idea to try boosting computers by combining them with a three-dimensional clump of lab-grown human brain cells, known as a brain organoid.

The human brain is the most energy efficient “computer” on Earth.

What’s new? A team from the University of Indiana Bloomington (UIB) has now unveiled a new one of these hybrid systems, which it calls “Brainoware.”

After growing a brain organoid from stem cells, the UIB team placed the tissue on a plate covered in thousands of electrodes. They could then use traditional computing hardware to deliver electrical pulses to the organoid and record its responding neural activity.

To demonstrate how such a system might be used, the team converted 240 recordings of 8 Japanese speakers saying vowel sounds into electrical pulses. They then trained an AI to predict which person was speaking based on the neural activity of the brain organoid in response to the electrical stimulation.

Brainoware’s predictions improved steadily during the training, and after 2 days, it could predict the speaker with 78% accuracy.

Brainoware could be a precursor to more advanced biocomputing systems in the future.

The big picture: Brainoware was less accurate at speech recognition than a traditional computing system running an AI, and keeping the organoid alive required a CO2 incubator and other power-hungry resources.

In other words, the system isn’t an improvement on the tech we already have — but it could prove to be a key stepping stone on the path to more advanced biocomputing systems in the future.

“We wanted to ask the question of whether we can leverage the biological neural network within the brain organoid for computing,” lead researcher Feng Guo told Tech Xplore. “This is just proof-of-concept to show we can do the job.”

We’d love to hear from you! If you have a comment about this article or if you have a tip for a future Freethink story, please email us at [email protected].

Subscribe to Freethink on Substack for free
Get our favorite new stories right to your inbox every week
Related
A personal assistant for everyone: The promise of ambient AI
We’re leaving the app era and entering the age of ambient AI: intelligent help that’s always on, but never in the way.
Gen Z: We must resist the temptation to cheat on everything
Adopting the “cheat on everything” mentality — treating thinking as a burden AI can eliminate — is not only wrong, it’s dangerous.
There are no new ideas in AI — only new datasets
Our next AI breakthrough will come when we unlock a source of data we’ve either overlooked or never fully harnessed.
Albert Einstein said automation caused the Great Depression. It didn’t.
Einstein blamed automation for the widespread unemployment of the Great Depression, but his reasoning was based on a false premise.
Has AI made “learn to code” obsolete?
Freethink talks to the creator of the world’s most popular AI coding assistant to find out whether learning to code is still worthwhile.
Up Next
A man standing in a kitchen with a robot.
Subscribe to Freethink for more great stories