Climate tech is booming — and this is better news than COP26

“The number one tool the U.S. has to speed the energy transition around the world is innovation."
Sign up for the Freethink Weekly newsletter!
A collection of our favorite stories straight to your inbox

This article is an installment of The Future Explored, a weekly guide to world-changing technology. You can get stories like this one straight to your inbox every Thursday morning by subscribing here.

Climate technology is in again. As world leaders gather in Glasgow this week for COP26, a common refrain is emerging: policy and pledges alone aren’t going to get us to net zero by 2050. We need more innovation. And fast. 

Policy shmolicy: This year’s UN climate conference has so far proven to be no different than the other 25 summits that have been held in the past: policymakers make voluntary pledges to cut carbon emissions to prevent rising global temperatures.

However, there’s no way to hold the pledge-makers accountable, so these summits tend to be mostly hot (warm?) air. Six years after the major Paris climate agreement, the world isn’t anywhere close to achieving the accord’s goal of limiting global warming to below 2° C this century. (To have a shot of reaching that goal, we’d need to hit net zero by 2050). 

Climate change is complex so there’s not going to be one technology that solves it — we’ll need to develop and deploy a range of technologies. 

But a new report shows that even if countries simply fulfilled their current climate pledges, we’ll still see at least a 2.7° C rise this century. This could still cause an increase in extreme and deadly weather events like rising sea levels and heatwaves.

Many solutions: Solving climate change is incredibly difficult: to decarbonize the world’s economy, we need to rethink how every industry generates energy. Agriculture, manufacturing, shipping, construction, fashion — all of these industries will need to modernize their equipment to use energy more sustainably. This takes time and billions of dollars. Meanwhile, the industries still need to make a profit. 

Given the complexity of the problem, there’s likely not going to be one technology that solves climate change; instead, we’ll need to develop and deploy a range of technologies. 

Bring in the tech: To achieve net zero by 2050, it’s estimated that 65% of emissions reductions can be achieved by existing technologies and policy changes. The other 35% will need to come from new technologies. 

“The number one tool the U.S. has to speed the energy transition around the world is innovation.”

Varun Sivaram, a senior advisor to John Kerry

Varun Sivaram, a senior advisor to John Kerry, told MIT Tech Review that the most important role the U.S. can play in leading global emissions reduction is to develop cheaper, better low-carbon technologies.

“The number one tool the U.S. has to speed the energy transition around the world is innovation,” he said. By funding R&D efforts, he notes, the U.S. could make it easier for other countries — especially emerging countries — to decarbonize.

Rise of the green economy: The good news is that a green energy economy is emerging — and VCs have noticed. According to the Morning Brew, in 2021 over $30 billion has already been poured into climate technology startups, up 30% from last year. 

Svenja Telle, Pitchbook analyst, told the Morning Brew that clean-industry technology is the fastest-growing sector of climate tech. This sector includes alternative energy and manufacturing innovation. 

  • There’s a big boom in lithium battery recycling. As more things are electrified, especially vehicles, we’ll need a way to recycle those batteries. 
    • Redwood Materials is among the startups leading the recycling charge. The company extracts materials that are usually mined — like cobalt, nickel, and lithium — from recycled consumer electronics and then sells those materials to its customers, like Panasonic.
  • Green hydrogen is also on the rise — this is a hydrogen fuel that can be made from renewable energy sources. It’s only byproduct is water. Right now, it’s too expensive to produce, but it may become cost-competitive in the near future. There are already a few massive hydrogen projects underway. 

Another fast growing area is built-environment companies, said Telle. This includes building construction and operations, which are responsible for about 39% of global emissions. 

  • The New York Times reports that more investors are looking at sustainable real estate, now that new technology and stricter standards enable better tracking of a development’s carbon footprint.” 
    • “Five to 10 years ago, there was a lot of debate about sustainability, that, ‘It’s nice, but I don’t want to pay for it,’” Stephen Tross, chief investment officer at a Dutch investment firm, told the NYT. “Today, you don’t sacrifice returns for sustainability, you create returns with sustainability.”
  • Turntide Technologies recently raised $225 million to continue developing their “smart motor” which makes motors much more efficient, reducing energy consumption by about 64%. 
    • “Today, half of the world’s energy is used by electric motors and nearly half of that energy consumption is being wasted due to inefficiency and lack of intelligent controls,”  Ryan Morris, CEO, told TechCrunch.

Over $30 billion has already been poured into climate technology this year, up 30% from last year.

Deja vu: From 2006 to 2011, we also saw a  “clean tech” boom that ended up being a disastrous bust — more than 90% of the cleantech startups funded during this time did not return the money invested in them. (Hey, Solyndra!)

However, this time appears to be different. One major reason is that renewable energy is now price-competitive with fossil fuels. That wasn’t the case in 2009, when solar power was over four times more expensive than fossil fuels. The price has fallen fast and is expected to get even cheaper. This has made a global transition to clean energy systems possible.

Another reason is that most of today’s climate technology startups are powered by software and machine learning. That means today’s startups are more likely to scale, compared to yesterday’s technology which leaned heavily on hard assets. 

“Investors were scared after what happened with Clean Tech 1.0, but it’s different this time. Back then everything was focused on really R&D-heavy technologies in clean energy. This time it’s about decarbonizing the entire economy,” Telle told Morning Brew. 

“Something that is relevant for every single sector. And it’s the only way forward.”

We’d love to hear from you! If you have a comment about this article or if you have a tip for a future Freethink story, please email us at [email protected].

Sign up for the Freethink Weekly newsletter!
A collection of our favorite stories straight to your inbox
Related
Should we turn the electricity grid over to AI?
AI could one day be woven throughout the grid management system — here are the pros and cons.
Charting the evolution of nuclear energy
Nuclear fission’s stalled growth might give way to fusion’s clean energy potential
The master plan to end EV “range anxiety” forever
A look at the history of EV charging and the tech trends that could encourage more people to make the switch to an electric car.
The startup using balloons to cool the planet
A look at the history of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), the arguments against it, and the startup putting it into action right now.
America’s plan to resurrect nuclear power
To increase its supply of clean nuclear power, the US government is cutting licensing fees, rewarding reactor innovation, and more.
Up Next
Subscribe to Freethink for more great stories